On June 20, Hanoi University of Science and Technology announced the score distribution of the first round of the thinking assessment exam. The average score of the candidates was 53.94. The highest score was 96.49; the lowest score was 20.97.
There were 6 candidates who scored above 90 points and 38 candidates who scored between 80 and 90. About 4,800 candidates scored above 50 points.
This year, Hanoi University of Science and Technology switched from paper-based thinking assessment to online computer-based testing, in the form of multiple-choice questions with many types of questions: choosing the correct option, choosing true or false answers, filling in answers, dragging/dropping answers.
The test has been adjusted to be more concise, with candidates taking 150 minutes, 120 minutes less than the old test. Of which, the Mathematical Thinking section lasts 60 minutes, Reading Comprehension 30 minutes, and Scientific Thinking/Problem Solving 60 minutes. The questions are designed according to a thinking scale with three levels: Reproduction, Inference, and Higher Level.
In addition to the exam on June 10, Hanoi University of Science and Technology organized two other exam sessions on June 17 and July 8. The total number of candidates registered for the exam was more than 10,200 with more than 19,200 exams because some students registered for 2-3 sessions.
Candidates take the thinking assessment test at Hanoi University of Science and Technology on the morning of June 10. Photo: Duong Tam
According to the 2023 enrollment plan, Hanoi University of Science and Technology will enroll nearly 8,000 students, of which 15-20% will be recruited through talent selection, 85-90% through thinking assessment test scores or high school graduation exams. Currently, the school has announced the admission scores through talent selection.
In addition to Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 31 other universities and academies use the results of the thinking assessment exam for admission.
32 schools use thinking assessment results
Source link
Comment (0)