(QNO) - On the afternoon of May 19, authorized by the Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee, Deputy Chief Inspector of the province Huynh Ngoc Tien chaired a dialogue with Mr. Duong Toi (Linh Sam Tay village, Tam Quang commune, Nui Thanh) regarding the complaint about the settlement of policies for people with meritorious services.
In the complaint, Mr. Duong Toi requested the competent authority, based on the records he had prepared, to propose recognition and settlement of the regime for revolutionary activists or resistance fighters who were imprisoned or exiled by the enemy according to regulations.
As a result of the first complaint settlement in Decision No. 513 dated December 30, 2022, the Director of the Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs did not recognize Mr. Duong Toi's complaint and stated that Mr. Duong Toi's request to resolve the regime for revolutionary activists or resistance fighters who were imprisoned or exiled by the enemy did not meet the conditions for resolving the regime according to regulations.
Not agreeing with the content of the first complaint settlement by the Director of the Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs, Mr. Duong Toi made a second complaint to the Chairman of the People's Committee of Quang Nam province. From verifying the content of the complaint, the Provincial Inspectorate concluded that, according to the file requesting to resolve the prison and exile regime of Mr. Duong Toi established and confirmed by the People's Committee of Tam Quang commune, the Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs of Nui Thanh district and the Police of Nui Thanh district, the Provincial Police and information from the masses, Mr. Duong Toi's case did not meet the conditions for consideration and resolution of the prison and exile regime.
Specifically, regarding procedures, the dossiers do not comply with the provisions of Decree No. 31 dated April 9, 2013 of the Government detailing and guiding the implementation of a number of articles of the Ordinance on preferential treatment for people with revolutionary contributions and Circular No. 05/2013/TT-BLDTBXH dated May 15, 2013 guiding the procedures for preparing dossiers, managing dossiers, and implementing preferential treatment for people with revolutionary contributions.
Regarding his background and participation in activities, according to his self-declaration and verification process, Mr. Duong Toi himself has not had any activities showing participation in revolutionary or resistance activities.
The basis for establishing and considering the settlement of prison and exile records is Clause 1, Article 46 of Decree No. 31 of the Government; Point b, Article 33 of Circular No. 05/2013; Article 9 of Circular No. 16/2014 of the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs and Official Dispatch No. 4256 dated December 1, 2014 of the Ministry of Public Security.
Accordingly, legal documents established before January 1, 1995 must meet the following conditions: Title of revolutionary or resistance activist. Time of imprisonment or exile by the enemy. Prison where the person was detained by the enemy. Must demonstrate the process of participating in the revolution or resistance activities before being imprisoned by the enemy.
According to the Provincial Inspectorate, the application file for policies for revolutionary activists and resistance fighters who were imprisoned or exiled by the enemy according to current regulations does not have a provision for two people to confirm as a basis for consideration and resolution.
In addition, Mr. Duong Toi's application for a reward for his achievements in the resistance war has not been awarded by the State for his achievements in the resistance war against the US, so it is not considered a legally valid document to be the basis for resolving the allowance for revolutionary activists and resistance fighters who were imprisoned and exiled by the enemy.
At the dialogue, the Provincial Inspectorate and relevant departments explained the issues related to the complaint content. Mr. Duong Toi also could not provide additional records, documents, and new evidence to determine that he was eligible for the prison and exile regime according to regulations.
Deputy Chief Inspector of the province Huynh Ngoc Tien said that the Provincial Inspectorate will recommend that the Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee issue a Decision to resolve the complaint in the direction of not recognizing the content of Mr. Duong Toi's complaint.
Source
Comment (0)