Accordingly, defendant Tran Hung was sentenced to 9 years in prison for accepting bribes. In the same case, defendant Nguyen Duy Hai (freelance worker) was sentenced to 27 months in prison for brokering bribes. 31 defendants were convicted of manufacturing and trading counterfeit goods, of which defendant Cao Thi Minh Thuan, Director of Phu Hung Phat Production and Trading Company Limited (abbreviated as Phu Hung Phat Company), received the highest sentence of 10 years in prison. The remaining group was sentenced to the lowest of 24 months in prison but given a suspended sentence, the highest of 6 years in prison.
The three defendants, former officers of Market Management Team No. 17 (Hanoi), were all convicted of abusing their positions and powers while performing official duties, with the lowest sentence being 18 months in prison but suspended, and the highest being 30 months in prison.
Defendant Tran Hung in court on July 27.
Regarding civil liability, the panel ordered defendant Tran Hung to return 300 million VND, the amount of bribe money received; and ordered defendant Cao Thi Minh Thuan and many other defendants to return about 30 billion VND, the amount of illegal profits from the production and sale of fake textbooks.
The first instance verdict determined that from the beginning of the year to June 2021, defendant Thuan and his accomplices produced and stored a total of nearly 9.5 million fake textbooks with a total value of more than VND 260 billion. This group organized the sale of more than 6.3 million books.
Previously, on July 9, 2020, Phu Hung Phat Company was inspected by Market Management Team No. 17 and more than 27,300 fake textbooks were seized. Knowing that defendant Tran Hung was the direct leader, defendant Thuan, through defendant Hai, gave defendant Tran Hung 300 million VND. After receiving the money, defendant Tran Hung instructed defendant Thuan to change his statement about the origin of the books, and at the same time intervened and created conditions for handling the case as an administrative violation instead of transferring it to the investigation agency.
During the trial, 35/36 defendants admitted their actions, but defendant Tran Hung insisted on his innocence, asserting that he did not receive any money or instruct defendant Thuan to change his testimony. Participating in the defense, defendant Tran Hung's lawyer argued that the basis for the charges had many contradictions, the defendant had an alibi, and requested immediate release in court.
However, the panel of judges determined that there was sufficient basis to conclude that defendant Tran Hung received a bribe of 300 million VND as alleged by the prosecutor. The evidence was the testimony of defendants Hai, Thuan and related people, along with the results of the field experiment, the call recordings, the diagram describing the location and the process of giving money drawn by defendant Hai himself...
Source link
Comment (0)