SGGP
According to the agenda of the 5th session, on May 30, the National Assembly discussed in groups the draft amendment to the National Assembly's resolution on taking a vote of confidence, a vote of no confidence for people holding positions elected or approved by the National Assembly or People's Council (draft).
At the plenary session of the Law Committee on the evening of May 26, Head of the Delegation Work Committee Nguyen Thi Thanh said that the draft has added specific provisions on prohibited acts to ensure that the vote of confidence is carried out objectively and transparently. At the same time, it has added provisions on suspending the implementation of some provisions in related laws to ensure the consistency and uniformity of legal provisions.
Amending Resolution No. 85/2014/QH13 is a very urgent task, because in 2023, the Politburo issued Regulation No. 96-QD/TW on taking a vote of confidence for leadership and management positions in the political system. Resolution No. 85/2014/QH13 needs to be amended to institutionalize Regulation 96, the most important of which is the regulation on the consequences for those who are subject to a vote of confidence, as well as the handling of these consequences.
According to Chairman of the Law Committee Hoang Thanh Tung, the draft basically met the set goals. However, it is not without basis when there are opinions that the concern that dynamic, creative, daring, daring, daring cadres... may easily "lose votes" is still a "problem". Not to mention that cadres in the health, education, and transportation sectors... directly related to the daily lives of the people are more likely to be rated lower in trust than those in less conflicted fields, cadres who "prefer to keep the peace".
To solve this “problem”, there must be very specific criteria for each subject to vote, in addition to general criteria on public ethics and personal ethics. For example, the trust of a minister must be viewed in both aspects: policy formulation and policy implementation. Along with that, voters need to have access to many information channels at different levels.
Of course, to ensure the final result is objective and most accurate, the sufficient condition is the fairness of the voters. But first of all, there must be all the necessary conditions, as mentioned.
Source
Comment (0)