Are elementary school students rated as average in behavior?

The incident in Dak Nong, where a child had average conduct, the father beat the teacher, causing public outrage.

Students in grades 1, 2, 3 are evaluated and classified according to Circular 27.

According to Clause 1, Article 5 of Circular 27/2020/TT-BGDDT, the assessment of primary school students is based on the following two contents:

- Evaluate students' learning process, progress and learning outcomes of each subject and educational activity according to the primary school general education program.

- Assess the formation and development of students' qualities and abilities through the following main qualities and core abilities:

+ Main qualities: patriotism, humanity, diligence, honesty, responsibility.

+ Core competencies include:

++ General competencies: autonomy and self-learning, communication and cooperation, problem solving and creativity;

++ Specific abilities: language, calculation, science, technology, information technology, aesthetics, physical.

Also according to the above circular, in the middle of semester I, the end of semester I, the middle of semester II and the end of the school year, the homeroom teacher coordinates with subject teachers based on the regular assessment process of learning subjects, educational activities and each student's main qualities and core competencies, to evaluate and classify primary school students according to the following levels:

- Periodically evaluate the learning content of subjects and educational activities according to 3 levels: well completed, completed, and incomplete.

- Periodically evaluate the formation and development of key qualities and core competencies according to the following 3 levels:

+ Good: Meets educational requirements well, clearly and regularly.

+ Achieved: Meets educational requirements, performance but not regularly.

+ Need to try: Not fully meeting educational requirements, unclear expression.

Evaluation results of a 2nd grade student in Ho Chi Minh City at the end of the 2022-2023 school year

This Circular takes effect from October 20, 2020 and is implemented according to the following roadmap:

From the 2020-2021 school year for grade 1.

From the 2021-2022 school year for grade 2.

From the 2022-2023 school year for grade 3.

From the 2023-2024 school year for grade 4.

From the 2024-2025 school year for grade 5.

Thus, by the end of this school year (2022-2023), students in grades 1, 2, and 3 (grades implementing the new 2018 General Education Program) will apply Circular 27/2020/TT-BGDDT to evaluate and classify primary school students. According to the above method, student conduct will no longer be classified according to the levels of good, fair, average...

The case of beating a teacher because the child had average behavior: Parents are also teachers

How are 4th and 5th graders evaluated and classified?

So what circular will be applied to evaluate and classify primary school students in the 2022-2023 school year for grade 4 and grade 5 students?

The assessment and classification of 4th and 5th grade students is applied in Circular 22/2016/TT-BGDDT amending and supplementing a number of articles of the regulations on assessment of primary school students issued together with Circular 30/2014/TT-BGDDT. Specifically:

Article 4. Assessment requirements

1. Evaluate for students' progress; emphasize motivation and encouragement in students' efforts in studying and practicing; help students maximize their abilities; ensure timeliness, fairness and objectivity.

2. Comprehensive assessment of students through assessment of the level of knowledge, skills and some manifestations of students' abilities and qualities according to primary education goals.

3. Regular assessment by comments, periodic assessment by scores combined with comments; combining assessment by teachers, students, parents, in which teacher assessment is the most important.

4. Evaluate students' progress, do not compare one student with another, do not put pressure on students, teachers and parents.

Article 5. Assessment content

1. Assess students' learning process, progress and learning outcomes according to knowledge and skill standards for each subject and other educational activities according to the primary school general education program.

2. Assess the formation and development of students' abilities and qualities:

a) Capacity: self-service, self-management; cooperation; self-study and problem solving;

b) Qualities: studious, hard-working; confident, responsible; honest, disciplined; united, loving.

The current way of evaluating and classifying primary school students is considered more humane and comprehensive.

Clause 3, Article 6 clearly states: Regular assessment of capacity and qualities:

a) Teachers base on the manifestations of students' awareness, skills, and attitudes in each capacity and quality to make comments and take timely measures to help;

b) Students are allowed to self-evaluate and participate in evaluating their friends and groups of friends on the manifestations of each ability and quality to improve themselves;

c) Encourage parents to discuss and coordinate with teachers to motivate and help students practice and develop their abilities and qualities.

Clause 3, Article 10 of Circular 22/2016/TT-BGDDT also stipulates: Periodic assessment of capacity and quality

In the middle of semester I, the end of semester I, the middle of semester II and the end of the school year, the homeroom teacher, based on the manifestations related to awareness, skills and attitudes in the regular assessment process on the formation and development of each student's capacity and quality, synthesizes according to the following levels:

a) Good: meets educational requirements well, clearly and regularly;

b) Achieved: meets educational requirements, performance but not regularly;

c) Need to try: not fully meeting educational requirements, unclear expression.

"Not classifying conduct as average, good, or fair in elementary school would be more humane."

Talking to Thanh Nien reporter, the principal of a primary school in Hoc Mon district, Ho Chi Minh City said that in the past, there was a period when primary school students were classified according to their conduct as good, fair, average, and poor. Currently, primary school students have circulars with specific regulations on assessing and classifying students in terms of their studies, the formation and development of each learner's capacity and qualities, according to the levels of good, achieved, and need to try.

"This evaluation method helps teachers evaluate students more comprehensively. And in primary school age, the stage of forming and developing personality, training qualities and abilities, teachers guide and teach children from the smallest things. Evaluating students with the levels of "good", "satisfactory", "need to try" is also humane, encouraging students to try harder than the words "poor conduct", "average conduct"... on the report card that will follow students throughout their lives", said this principal.

Quick view 12:00 on May 27: Revealing the mystery of the burned body in Binh Duong | Parents came to the teacher's house to beat her

Source link: https://thanhnien.vn/vu-co-giao-bi-danh-hoc-sinh-tieu-hoc-co-xep-loai-hanh-kiem-trung-binh-185230527175539762.htm