Government Inspectorate "names" 18 projects with limitations and violations in Hai Phong City

(NLDO) - The Government Inspectorate discovered that many projects in Hai Phong City are behind schedule and have to extend land use term due to slow progress.

On December 23, the Government Inspectorate (GIA) issued a conclusion on the inspection of land management and use in accordance with Resolution No. 73 dated September 23, 2019 and Resolution No. 116 dated December 6, 2019 of the Government; planning and implementation of construction planning of Hai Phong City People's Committee.

TTCP inspected 18 projects using land in Hai Phong City, thereby discovering a number of limitations, shortcomings, and violations. Specifically, 11/18 projects had limitations and shortcomings in planning work: At the time of deciding on investment policies, approving detailed construction planning, architectural plans, project locations were not suitable, synchronous with the general planning, zoning planning or architectural plans exceeded the clearance height approved by the General Staff.

The Government Inspectorate discovered a number of limitations, shortcomings and violations at the Hoang Huy - So Dau project in Hai Phong City. In the photo is a perspective of the project. Photo: Haiphong.gov.vn

Some detailed construction planning projects at a scale of 1/500 have limited quality and need to be studied and adjusted. Some expenditures do not ensure standards or have not yet received consensus from the Ministry of Construction as prescribed for projects located next to national highways.

Some projects, the time of investment approval was not completely consistent with the planning and land use plan, and were later updated and adjusted, basically overcoming the limitations and shortcomings in planning work.

There are 2/18 projects with limitations and shortcomings in selecting investors to implement housing projects. Specifically, the International Overseas Vietnamese Village project did not conduct bidding to select investors according to the provisions of the law on housing.

According to the Government Inspectorate, 3/18 projects have limitations and shortcomings in land allocation and land leasing, such as: Land allocation to investors for the entire land area within the planning scope of non-civil infrastructure works not included in the project; land allocation but not clearly defining the land use structure, form and duration of land allocation leading to the issuance of an adjustment decision as a basis for management and determination of financial obligations, exemptions and reductions corresponding to each type of land or according to regulations, the project must apply the form of land allocation but the City People's Committee has not yet changed the land use purpose to allocate land but still applies the form of land leasing, which is unfounded.

There are 8/18 projects with limitations and shortcomings in determining the land use fee of the project, such as: Applying the surplus method to determine land price but analyzing and selecting comparable assets does not ensure compliance with regulations; determining some revenue and expenses without basis; determining infrastructure costs in development costs without considering the area where the investor commits to pay for infrastructure construction or without considering infrastructure costs for the planned area of ​​non-civil infrastructure works not included in the project.

"Not allocating infrastructure costs when determining land prices for each type of land according to the land use structure of the project, reviewing and re-determining land use fees and construction costs according to the basic design and technical design that have been appraised and approved; determining the infrastructure investment capital rate that is not correct for the project scale or incorrectly applying legal documents guiding land valuation at the time of land valuation" - the Government Inspectorate concluded.

The inspection conclusion also pointed out that 5/18 projects at the time of inspection had limitations and shortcomings, such as: Slow completion of financial obligations regarding land use fees; failure to declare as a basis for confirming and notifying the amount of money for protection and development of rice-growing land to be paid to the budget or late payment of money for protection and development of rice-growing land according to the announcement of the Department of Finance.

There are 5 projects that are slow in determining and collecting land rent from the time of land allocation until the City People's Committee reclaims the land because the investor voluntarily returns the land. According to the report of the Hai Phong City People's Committee, after the TTCP finished its direct inspection, the City People's Committee has directed to gradually overcome the problem: The investor of the Residential Area Project in Vinh Bao Town has fully paid the land use fee and late payment fee to the state budget according to the notice of the Tax Department; the investor of the Nam Cau Kien Industrial Park Project has made additional declarations and paid the full amount of money for protection and development of rice-growing land according to the notice of the Department of Finance.

There are 5/18 projects with limitations and shortcomings, such as: Slow approval of land prices, slow determination of additional land use fees and land rents after planning adjustments; failure to determine land prices according to the new land use purpose converted to implement the project; failure to determine land prices and clarify exemptions and reductions of land use fees and land rents for socialized establishments or issuance of investment certificates including land rent exemptions that are not in accordance with regulations but were promptly adjusted later.

There are 7/18 projects with limitations and shortcomings: Slow progress in implementing investment projects, projects that must extend land use term due to slow progress according to land law.

For the 2 counterpart projects of the BT project (Hoang Huy - So Dau Project, Hoang Huy Green River New Urban Area Project), Hai Phong City People's Committee did not determine to terminate loan interest when implementing land allocation according to the provisions of Decree No. 69/2019. However, the Department of Construction and the Investor later had a Minutes confirming the completion of payment for the BT Project, in which late payment interest was not calculated according to the BT Contract.

Some projects, investors construct but do not have a construction permit or do not construct according to the approved detailed planning, the granted construction permit or some households receive the transfer but the project's houses and land violate construction order.

According to the Government Inspectorate, the responsibility for the above limitations and shortcomings lies with the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Hai Phong City People's Committee in charge of the relevant field during the relevant period; the City's Land Valuation Council during the relevant period; Directors and Deputy Directors in charge of the fields of departments and branches; investors of projects...

18 inspected projects include:

1. Hoang Huy - So Dau project invested by Dai Thinh Vuong Construction Joint Stock Company

2. Vu Yen Island Amusement Park, Housing and Ecological Park Project invested by Vingroup Corporation - Joint Stock Company

3. Tien Lang Town Industrial Cluster Project

4. Binh Bridge Park Project (Phase 1) on the South bank of Cam River invested by Nam Song Cam Joint Stock Company

5. Social housing construction investment project No. 39 Luong Khanh Thien, Cau Dat ward, Ngo Quyen district, invested by Hai Phong Toa Xa Joint Stock Company

6. NPK fertilizer factory construction investment project in Kien Bai commune, Thuy Nguyen district - invested by GFS Vietnam Agricultural Development Joint Stock Company

7. Housing development and urban planning project at 80 Ha Ly, Ha Ly ward, Hong Bang district, invested by Newland Construction Investment Joint Stock Company.

8. Do Son International Hotel Project invested by NC Home Real Estate Trading Joint Stock Company

9. Residential area development project in Vinh Bao town invested by Saigon Garment - Match Joint Stock Company

10. Housing Construction Project in Le Thien Commune, An Duong District, invested by Thanh Binh Construction Company Limited

11. MP Dinh Vu Industrial Park Project in Dong Hai Ward, Hai An District, invested by Minh Phuong Real Estate Investment Joint Stock Company

12. Investment project of Matexim Hai Phong Plaza Building at 20 Tran Phu Street, Ngo Quyen District, invested by Matexim Hai Phong Joint Stock Company - Animex

13. Investment project to build an international Vietnamese village in Vinh Niem ward, Le Chan district, invested by Viet Anh Investment and Development Joint Stock Company.

14. Investment project to build the Commercial Housing Project at 85 Cau Niem roundabout, invested by Bach Dang Construction Corporation

15. Investment project to build a housing area in Nam Hai ward, Hai An district, invested by H2H Vietnam Investment Joint Stock Company

16. Hoang Huy Green River new urban area project in Hoa Dong commune, Thuy Nguyen district, invested by Hoang Huy Financial Services Investment Joint Stock Company.

17. Nam Cau Kien Industrial Park Project in Hoang Don Commune (Thuy Nguyen District), invested by Shinec Joint Stock Company

18. Investment project on technical infrastructure business of Dinh Vu end-of-line service area phase I (Hai An district), invested by Vidifi Duyen Hai Investment Joint Stock Company.

Source: https://nld.com.vn/thanh-tra-chinh-phu-diem-ten-18-du-an-co-han-che-vi-pham-tai-tp-hai-phong-196241223183540261.htm