Celadon City buyer sues Gamuda Land to cancel contract

Công LuậnCông Luận21/08/2024


According to Ms. D.TN - one of the plaintiffs in the civil case, from 2020 to the end of 2022, she made a deposit and paid money to buy 4 apartments in the Diamond Centery subdivision (area A6) of the Tan Thang Sports Complex and Residential Area project (commercial name is Celadon City, on land plot number 39, map sheet number 40, in Son Ky ward, Tan Phu district, Ho Chi Minh City).

In particular, the apartment that Ms. N. bought the earliest has the code C5.0.05, with a deposit of 200 million VND on November 24, 2020. By October 13, 2022, Gamuda Land signed a Civil Contract with Ms. N. on the sale and purchase of this apartment with a total contract value of more than 10,886 billion VND. As of March 15, 2023, Ms. N. has paid Gamuda Land more than 1.6 billion VND.

In her presentation to the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court, Ms. D.TN stated that, due to the A6 area, the Celadon City Project was only notified by the Ho Chi Minh City Department of Construction to open for sale according to Document No. 6351/SXD-PTN&TTBDS dated May 8, 2023. Meanwhile, Gamuda Land had signed a contract with the plaintiff for the above 4 apartments before the above time. Therefore, Gamuda Land signed the contract without permission to open for sale and lease the apartments in the A6 area.

Customer review of Celadon City project, Gamuda Land, request to cancel contract, image 1

Celadon City project has had many problems between customers and investors.

According to this customer, Gamuda Land violated: Article 55, Clause 2, Law on Real Estate Business 2014: "Before selling or leasing future housing, the investor must notify the provincial housing management agency in writing that the housing is eligible for sale or leasing."

“Because they were not allowed to open for sale, Gamuda Land signed the contract and collected money, which is illegal capital mobilization. Meanwhile, as a customer, I always paid in full and on time according to the payment installments agreed by both parties and only stopped paying when I learned that the actual investor had violated the law and intentionally deceived me about the project's legal documents,” Ms. D.TN was indignant.

This customer also said that before the A6 area announced the opening for sale, many residents had asked the investor to clarify legal issues. However, Gamuda Land only acknowledged and did not answer the customers' questions. Therefore, Ms. D.TN and a number of customers who bought houses in the A6 area decided to file a lawsuit to cancel the sale contract and at the same time request the investor to be responsible for paying interest due to violations.

In mid-May 2024, Tan Phu District People's Court opened a first-instance trial of the civil case "Apartment sale and purchase contract dispute" and declared to partially accept the plaintiffs' lawsuit request; declared the sale and purchase contracts invalid; did not accept Gamuda Land's counterclaims,... Due to the appeal, the case continued to be transferred to the appellate court.

On April 13, 2023, Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee signed Decision 1426/QD-XPHC to administratively sanction Gamuda Land for violations in real estate business activities due to the act of "Illegal capital mobilization" at the Tan Thang Sports and Residential Complex project - Celandon City.

Specifically, the Company signed an apartment sale and purchase contract at the A5 Apartment Complex project of the Celandon City project when it did not meet the conditions for sale and lease according to regulations. For this violation, Gamuda Land was fined VND900 million and forced to remedy the consequences by returning the capital mobilized in violation of regulations.



Source: https://www.congluan.vn/xet-xu-vu-khach-hang-mua-celadon-city-kien-gamuda-land-yeu-cau-huy-hop-dong-post308588.html

Comment (0)

No data
No data

Same tag

Same category

Same author

Figure

French father brings daughter back to Vietnam to find mother: Unbelievable DNA results after 1 day
Can Tho in my eyes
17-second video of Mang Den so beautiful that netizens suspect it was edited
The primetime beauty caused a stir because of her role as a 10th grade girl who is too pretty even though she is only 1m53 tall.

No videos available