BTO - This morning, May 24, continuing the 5th session, under the chairmanship of National Assembly Chairman Vuong Dinh Hue, the National Assembly listened to reports on the 2021 state budget settlement; discussed in the hall a number of contents with different opinions of the draft Law on Bidding (amended).
Giving his opinion, Deputy Head of the Provincial Delegation of National Assembly Deputies Nguyen Huu Thong highly appreciated the drafting agency and the verification agency for fully absorbing the opinions of experts and National Assembly Deputies at the 4th session and the National Assembly Deputies' Conference of Specialized Activities last April.
Specific comments on the forms of contractor selection, according to delegate Nguyen Huu Thong: At point a, clause 2, Article 22 of the draft Law on Bidding (amended), there is a provision that limited bidding is applied in cases where the bidding package has high technical requirements or specific techniques and only a few contractors meet the requirements of the bidding package. In order to have a basis for implementation in accordance with reality, delegate Nguyen Huu Thong suggested considering adding clear regulations on criteria to determine bidding packages with high technical requirements or specific techniques to implement in accordance with regulations or assigning the Government to issue a Decree with specific instructions. Because if the criteria are not clearly defined, it will lead to arbitrary application and easily lead to violations.
Regarding the settlement of petitions, complaints and denunciations: Regarding the Advisory Council for settlement of petitions at the local level stipulated in Point c, Clause 3, Article 96, delegate Nguyen Huu Thong proposed to supplement and clearly define the settlement responsibilities of the provincial and district levels to suit the reality.
Article 19 stipulates the Expert Group and Appraisal Group, Clause 3 of the draft law stipulates: “Members of the Expert Group and Appraisal Group must have professional qualifications related to the bidding package or project or have at least 3 years of work experience in a field related to the legal, technical and financial content of the bidding package or project”. Delegate Nguyen Huu Thong suggested that the draft law should have more specific and clear regulations to have a basis for application. According to the delegate, it is necessary to specify which field or which goods require professional qualifications related to the bidding package.
At point h, clause 1, Article 23 of the draft regulation on designated bidding stipulates: "Consulting packages, construction of relocation of technical infrastructure works, bomb, mine and explosive clearance to serve the work of site clearance" - according to delegate Nguyen Huu Thong, currently there are many contractors with sufficient capacity and experience to implement these works. Therefore, to ensure competition, fairness and reduce costs, it is proposed not to apply the form of designated bidding for consulting and construction packages for relocation of technical infrastructure works to serve the work of site clearance.
In addition, in Article 36 - Overall plan for selecting contractors for the project, according to delegate Nguyen Huu Thong, there should be no regulations on making an overall plan for selecting contractors and it is recommended to continue making a plan for selecting contractors according to the provisions of the 2013 Bidding Law.
In Article 43 - Process and procedures for selecting contractors, Point d, Clause 1 stipulates: "For bidding packages for the procurement of goods, construction and installation, provision of non-consulting services applying international bidding, mixed bidding packages and bidding packages with high technical requirements, if necessary, the inviting party may negotiate a contract with the first-ranked contractor". Delegate Thong suggested that the draft law should specify more clearly the contents of "bidding packages with high technical requirements" and what are "necessary cases" and what are unnecessary cases to have a basis for implementation. Because there will be cases where the inviting party and the investor determine "not necessary" but the competent authorities when inspecting, checking, evaluating and concluding that it is "necessary"...
Source
Comment (0)