The document clearly states that the school's implementation of revenue collection has errors and violations.
Specifically, the content of the school leaders' implementation to homeroom teachers of each class regarding the implementation of the collection of fees is not consistent and clear. Some fees are not in accordance with regulations, leading to homeroom teachers not fully understanding, so when implementing to parents of students, it causes bad public opinion.
Accordingly, there are some fees that the school leaders have implemented, however, the homeroom teachers do not notify the parents of the students. Or there are some fees that the homeroom teachers notify the parents but are not included in the school's list.
Verification of expected revenues at Thanh Mien III High School. (Source: Hai Duong Department of Education and Training)
There are 4 fees in the homeroom teacher's statement that are not included in the list of school guidelines, including: Parents' Association Fund, TV purchase fee, summer tuition fee, photocopy fee. There are 2 fees higher than the fees announced by the school: parking fee and electronic report card.
The school's collection of fees at the meeting with the homeroom teacher is not in accordance with the regulations in Resolution 08/2022/NQ-HDND and current documents.
Specifically, there are 6 fees that are not included in the regulations, including notebook fees, chair fees, survey fees, general test fees, class funds, and textbook fees. There are 3 fees that exceed the regulations, including drinking water fees, student card fees, and electronic contact books.
Besides, there are 2 revenue items that have not been implemented properly, including sponsorship money (socialization) and parents' association fund money.
According to the Department of Education and Training of Hai Duong, the school has just planned a list of fees and the fee levels for homeroom teachers to publicly announce and ask for opinions from parents. The implementation of the contents in the meeting to homeroom teachers was not specific, leading to homeroom teachers arbitrarily adding other fees to the fee collection content and combining all the fees for the entire school year in some fees into one collection period, which is not in accordance with regulations.
The school principal's collection of fees did not follow the list closely. Some fees were higher than the allowed ceiling, causing bad public opinion.
" The reason for the above errors is that the principal has not fully grasped the current documents and regulations, " the Department's document stated.
The Department's inspection team requested the school principal to instruct the homeroom teacher to stop collecting the fees that are being collected. At the same time, review the implementation of the fees and collection levels in accordance with regulations.
The Department also requested the school principal to review his/her own responsibilities and those of related individuals in implementing the collection of fees at the beginning of the school year; and report to the Department of Education and Training before September 20.
As VTC News reported, last week, social networks were abuzz with images of statistics showing the amount parents had to pay at the beginning of the school year, up to 8.7 million VND.
Specifically, Facebook account Pham Van Tuyen posted a photo of the statistics of the beginning of the year revenues of Thanh Mien III High School on social networks and became the center of attention. The items listed in this list include: Tuition, parking, personal insurance, health insurance, notebooks, seats, student cards, drinking water, sanitation, parent association fund, uniforms, electronic contact books, surveys, general tests, television, socialization, scholarship fund. The total revenue is 8,715,000 VND.
According to Mr. Tuyen, the list of these fees was drafted by the homeroom teacher after the parent-teacher meeting. The parents were not explained which fees were required to be paid according to regulations and which were paid voluntarily. The amount of money to be paid was quite large, so they were very concerned.
Mr. Pham Van Hy, Principal of Thanh Mien III High School, confirmed that the image of the beginning of the year collection of more than 8.7 million VND spread on social networks was drafted by a teacher in the school, but this is not the official plan.
Ms. Vu Thi Thuy - the homeroom teacher of class 10D of the school confirmed that the information on the list posted by Mr. Tuyen was created by her. However, according to Ms. Thuy's explanation, while creating the list, there was an emergency at home so she did not check and compare, leading to errors and confusion compared to the announcement in the school's expected contribution plan.
EXAM EXAM
Source
Comment (0)