According to the appeal, Hong Loan did not accept the decision of the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court (HCMC People's Court) to declare that Ms. Vo Thi Hong Nhung (sister of the late Meritorious Artist Vu Linh) is entitled to 15% of the total value of the inheritance left by the late artist.
In the appeal, the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court ruled that Hong Loan was the legitimate child and the only heir of the first order of succession of Mr. Vo Van Ngoan (Meritorious Artist Vu Linh). However, the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court divided the inheritance of the late artist Vu Linh into two parts, 85% for Hong Loan and 15% for Ms. Hong Nhung, considering Ms. Nhung's efforts and current circumstances. According to Hong Loan, the above judgment and division by the court of first instance had no legal basis.
Hong Loan stated in the petition that Ms. Hong Nhung had absolutely no contribution to the legacy of the late artist Vu Linh. The assets including the house at 5 Doan Thi Diem; the car and 3,007 square meters of land in Thu Duc City (HCMC) were established by the late Meritorious Artist Vu Linh in 1991, 1995 and 1998, after he separated his household registration and no longer lived at the house on Vo Di Nguy Street, Ward 9, Go Vap District, HCMC with Mr. Vo Thanh Nhieu and Ms. Hong Nhung. Therefore, Ms. Hong Nhung had no contribution, no management, no preservation, no embellishment to create the value of the legacy of the late artist Vu Linh.
"Therefore, the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court's decision that Ms. Hong Nhung contributed to my father's legacy and declared that Ms. Nhung is entitled to 15% of the total value of my father's legacy is completely baseless," Hong Loan wrote in her appeal.
In addition, Hong Loan's side believes that the court of first instance cited Precedent No. 05/2016/AL and cited fairness in resolving civil cases in her specific case, which is incorrect.
According to the precedent, "in an inheritance dispute case, there is a party who is entitled to receive a portion of the inheritance and has contributed to the management and restoration of the inheritance...". Meanwhile, Ms. Hong Nhung filed a lawsuit requesting the court to reject her status as the first-line heir and the entire inheritance belonging to the second-line heir. Therefore, when the court determined that Hong Loan was the only person belonging to the first-line heir of the late artist Vu Linh, she must be the one with full rights to inherit the entire inheritance of the late artist. The court divided 85% for Hong Loan and 15% for Ms. Hong Nhung, meaning that it determined that Ms. Hong Nhung is the party entitled to receive a portion of the inheritance.
"Mrs. Nhung's care of my grandmother (if any) is the duty of children to their parents. Mrs. Nhung is also a child, not my father's sole duty. In fact, at that time, my father worked hard to support the whole family (including Mrs. Nhung)... The Court of First Instance's consideration of Mrs. Nhung's efforts on the above grounds and arguments is completely incorrect and also beyond the scope of Mrs. Nhung's lawsuit request, which is a dispute over inheritance," Hong Loan stated.
In addition, Hong Loan believes that the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court did not apply the spirit of Precedent 05/2026/AL and "fairness" when it sentenced Ms. Hong Nhung to receive 15% of the late artist Vu Linh's inheritance. If the court had resolved the case on a humane and emotional basis, it should have asked for opinions and analyzed so that Hong Loan would agree and acknowledge her willingness to help Ms. Hong Nhung, then the verdict would have been reasonable and reasonable.
Hong Loan filed a petition asking the High People's Court in Ho Chi Minh City to review the appeal and amend the first instance judgment to not allow Ms. Hong Nhung to enjoy 15% of artist Vu Linh's inheritance.
On January 7, the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court opened the first instance trial of the inheritance dispute; requesting the cancellation of a separate decision and claiming a house for temporary residence related to the inheritance of Mr. Vo Van Ngoan (aka the late artist Vu Linh), between the plaintiff, Ms. Vo Thi Hong Nhung (younger sister of Meritorious Artist Vu Linh) and the defendant, Ms. Vo Thi Hong Loan (daughter of Meritorious Artist Vu Linh).
As a result, the panel of judges decided that Ms. Hong Nhung was entitled to 15% of the late Meritorious Artist Vu Linh's estate, while the remaining 85% belonged to Hong Loan. The estate included: land and house at 5 Doan Thi Diem, Phu Nhuan District, Ho Chi Minh City; 3,007 m2 of land in Thu Duc City (Ho Chi Minh City) and a car.
After the enforcement agency has the results of the property valuation and the voluntary enforcement period, Hong Loan is obliged to refund Ms. Hong Nhung 15% of the value of the inheritance. Once the obligation to refund has been completed, Ms. Loan has the right to register the transfer of ownership and use of the above-mentioned assets, as well as request Ms. Hong Nhung and her children to move all personal assets out of house number 5 Doan Thi Diem. After the prescribed period, if Ms. Loan fails to fulfill her obligation, the enforcement agency will auction the above-mentioned assets.
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/hong-loan-nop-don-khang-cao-vu-tranh-chap-thua-ke-cua-co-nsut-vu-linh-185250117133229011.htm
Comment (0)